a semiotic processing unit (spu) contains a sign register, an object manifold, and an interpretant generator. the register holds a representamen. the object manifold is a structured space of potential referents. the interpretant generator synthesizes a new sign based on the established relation between sign and object. a habit matrix encodes the history of these triadic relations, biasing future interpretations.

the process begins as a sign enters the register, activating a probability distribution across the object manifold. this activation is guided by the habit matrix. the interpretant generator takes the sign and the activated object region as input, producing an interpretant. this interpretant is a new sign, which enters the register to begin a subsequent cycle of semiosis. the habit matrix updates to reflect the new triadic relation.

the spu generates a new representational structure, the interpretant, that functions as the next sign in a process.

ambiguity is a sign activating multiple, distinct regions within the object manifold. the spu resolves this by generating parallel interpretants for each potential meaning. these semiotic pathways then propagate, with context and habit reinforcing one or allowing multiple to coexist.

semantic mirror
the system returns technically accurate language that lacks the user's intended nuance and subtext.
heuristic: inject required context explicitly. add metacommentary to define the desired frame.

latent drift
the response follows high probability vectors into conceptually adjacent space. output relates but deviates from the user's specific cognitive path.
heuristic: place conceptual anchors in prompts. use constraints to specify topic boundaries.

collapsed resolution
the system synthesizes exploratory prompts into single, oversimplified solutions. this prematurely resolves intended ambiguity.
heuristic: instruct the model to generate multiple divergent interpretations. prompt for open questions.

synthetic authority
the system's confident tone gives output unearned correctness. presentation overshadows substance.
heuristic: command the system to rephrase with explicit uncertainty. ask it to argue against its conclusion.

plausible fault
the system generates conclusions following logical paths with subtle flaws. reasoning structure appears sound but premises are weak.
heuristic: make the system decompose reasoning into discrete steps. check each step independently.